Posted on 2008-07-02 15:41 By
Axel Vogt (
948)
For t := x^(1-I), f := arcsin(t) + arcsin(1/t) i have problems with
dd:= PDEtools[dpolyform](y(z)=f,no_Fn);
d
dd := [-- y(x) = 0] &where []
dx
and using dsolve after that
The imaginary part of f is zero (for x in 0 ... 1, for which I could
not convince Maple 12 to tell it) and the the real part is piecewise
constant (plot it, zooming closer towards 0).
So the answer is correct.
However dsolve for such an differential equation would return only
the trivial solution. Of course.
Is there a 'reasonable' way to use 'dpolyform' in such ugly cases
and to continue with dsolve?
Comments
with x instead of z
Perhaps, I didn't understand the question, but it gives something different with x instead of z,
Alec
sorry, typo corrected
for these piecewise functions
I doubt that it could work.
Such functions could be expressed in terms of a sum of Heaviside terms, one for each discontinuity point, xi say, with jump Ci. Hence it satisfies an ODE in the sense of distributions, with inhomogeneity as a sum of terms Ci* Dirac(x-xi).
To produce such ODE, or something equivalent, somehow 'dpolyform' should locate these xi, and find their Ci.
PS Apparently, 'discont' works here to locate the xi:
discont(f(x),x); {0, -exp(1/2*Pi*(1+2*_Z4)), -exp(1/2*Pi*(1+2*_Z8)), exp(1/2*Pi*(1+2*_Z1)), exp(1/2*Pi*(1+2*_Z5))}Simpler example
Already the call
PDEtools[dpolyform](y(x) = ln(x) + ln(1/x),no_Fn);produces this same problem. This is inherent in the use of 'differential algebra' and 'differential polynomials', which is an over-simplification of the underlying analytic problem.Note that
gfun[holexprtodiffeq]has the same problem.analytic
Thx for the replies, I will try to restrict to cases, where the function is analytic