every thing is correct but i dont know why my PDE is not be zero, i did by another way is satidy but i change whole equation by sabstitutiin then i did ode test is satisfy by putting case in equation and solution with condition but when i want to use pdetest  test in pde is not satisfy ?

Download pdetest.mw

Is there something one can do to make Maple give same result each time? It seems all random.

Calling odetest sometimes gives internal error. 

            Error, (in trig/normal/sincosargs) too many levels of recursion

But it is random when and how it happens. Worksheet below shows that sometimes when adding infolevel[odetest]:=5; make the error go away. sometimes trying 2 or 3 times also makes the error go away.

This makes it impossible to reason about things, as sometimes I get different result using same exact code.

Is there something one can do to remove this internal error? Why it happens sometimes only?  Do I need to clear something before calling odetest to make sure same result is obtained each time?

Download why_odetest_sometimes_fail_internal.mw

Add tracelast; after an error gives long output with this at end

...
#(\`trig/normal\`,8): sincosargs := [\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`(a)];
 \`trig/normal/sincosargs\` called with arguments: ((-2472*2^(1/2)+3496)*3^(1/2)-4288*2^(1/2)+6064)*(10+7*2^(1/2))^(1/2)+(6008*6^(1/2)-8496*3^(1/2)+10408*2^(1/2)-14720)*cos((1/24)*Pi)
 #(\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`,2): return op(map(procname,{op(x)}))
 \`trig/normal/sincosargs\` called with arguments: ((-2472*2^(1/2)+3496)*3^(1/2)-4288*2^(1/2)+6064)*(10+7*2^(1/2))^(1/2)
 #(\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`,2): return op(map(procname,{op(x)}))
 \`trig/normal/sincosargs\` called with arguments: (-2472*2^(1/2)+3496)*3^(1/2)-4288*2^(1/2)+6064
 #(\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`,2): return op(map(procname,{op(x)}))
 \`trig/normal/sincosargs\` called with arguments: (-2472*2^(1/2)+3496)*3^(1/2)
 #(\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`,2): return op(map(procname,{op(x)}))
 \`trig/normal/sincosargs\` called with arguments: -2472*2^(1/2)+3496
 #(\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`,2): return op(map(procname,{op(x)}))
 \`trig/normal/sincosargs\` called with arguments: -2472*2^(1/2)
 #(\`trig/normal/sincosargs\`,2): return op(map(procname,{op(x)}))

Not only is it random error, it also can not be cought using try/catch. So the whole program now stop and there is no way around it. If it was at least possible to trap the error, then it will not be a big deal. But when not even possible to trap Maple errors, then what is one to do? 

Update Jan 18, 2025

I did not want to make new post on this, even though the error is different, but it is similar issue to this post.

I found another example of this random failure of odetest using same input.  May be this will help Maplesoft find the cause. 

The internal error this time is Error, (in depends) too many levels of recursion

In this worksheet below. the same ode and 3 solutions were used. As you see, sometimes odetest do not generate internal error, and sometimes it does. All happen on 3rd call to odetest. 

So it is completely random why this happen. The first and 4ht tries generate no error, but the second and the third do. All were run after restart is called. So one would expect same output from each try,

Download bug_odetest_jan_18_2025.mw

Hello,

I present the result of work on a new project in the field of classical mechanics. It is a grateful and interesting topic that gives a lot of satisfaction. I am attaching the Maple worksheet.

Best regards

Rolling_Disk_3D_on_x0y_plane.mw

Hey guys,

I have to solve a bunch of systems of polynomial equations und dome restrictions given by inequalitites. I have 8 variables, 8 equations and and 13 inequalitites. Since the simple solve or SemiAlgebraic command are not able to solve every system I tryd some other ways. Right now I try to bring the set of equations and ineqaulities in a better from or structure using RealTriangulize from the RegularChains library. Later on I want to take those results and use solve or SemiAlgebraic again, hoping, that Maple than finds the solutions and is not calculating for houres without a result. I already know, that you can have diffrent outputs for RealTriangularize (I know list, record, piecewise and zerodimensional, althought the last one is not really helpful). Since I want to go on wirking with the results I need to have them in a form, that I can read of the new equations and inequalities to put them into solve. Often that works totaly fine, but sometimes I get an output I dont understand. I understand what It means but I dont understand why Maple uses that type of output. If you have a look in the attached file you can see what I mean:

I would like to get results like in dec_5334. I can easily go on working with this kind of form. In dec_5380 you can see a diffrent output. I dont see the point of giving me this output. the second line i basically epmty. and in the first line the solution is broken into peaces. when a certain solution just works under some inequalitites, why dont they put those four inequalities inside of the list in front of it? Is there a workaround for the "normal" output? Or is there a way to read off the lines from this kind of structure, with the open { in front ?

The same problem appears in dec_5382. WHy dont give me a list with to lists of equations and inequalities to show me both solutions?
In the last example dec_5382_record you can see the output when you change the corresponding option in RealTrinagularize. But here I again have the problem that I dont know how to read of the equations and inequalities from the open curly bracket.

If anyone could help me, I would be very glad. Thank yu in advance.

Regards

Felix

Download Output_of_RegularChains.mw

Is there a way to put in intervals and get the output as inequality Notation? Something like this ->

i want to factoring the (m+G'/G) in my long equation but i use some trick but still i can't get the exactly system and still G will remain in my system what should i factoring for remove this G(xi) from my system is all about factoring , my system of equation are wrong contain G(xi) How i can remove it by taking a factoring or any other technique,

not parameter is arbitrary except V and sigma''

Download G-factoring.mw

I’m trying to solve a stiff system 1-D PDEs numerically in Maple but I’m getting the following error:

“Error, (in pdsolve/numeric/match_PDEs_BCs) cannot handle systems with multiple PDE describing the time dependence of the same dependent variable, or having no time dependence”

I included a picture of the PDEs and their BCs in the attached maple file. For easy reading, the attached file includes highlighted sections for parameters and variables. You can skip those to PDEs, BCs and ICs sections at the end of the document to reach the error I’m facing.

For reference, I used another software to solve the system and I was able to get the results in few seconds, so I think it is solvable. However, personally I prefer to use Maple so any inputs, insights, workarounds that I could use to handle the system in Maple would be of great help to me. Thank you.

question.mw

Dear Maple users

I am using the LinearInterpolation command from the Interpolation package. When I however want to integrate the result from one number to another, I only receive an abstract result. It is probably an easy question, but somehow I can't figure it out. I tried using MakeFunction and evalf command in order to receive a number for the integral. I hope someone can help.

Erik

Download Using_interpolation.mw

For plotting phase plot of two system of equations (autonomous), is there an option to increase of reduce number of arrows/line drawn?  I am not able to find such an option from help.

Below is an example. Google AI says stepsize should change the number of arrows, but it does not. It had no effect. Below is worksheet showing one example where I like to reduce number of arrows (not the size of the arrow, which is set to medium now).

I also tried numpoints option and it had no effect of how many arrows are drawn

Download change_number_of_arrows_jan_4_2025.mw

For reference, I'd like to do something similar using another system as below where it has option to change number of arrows.

every structure is true but my plot not run where is issue?
plot.mw

I've been trying to explore or animate a bode plot without success.  I kept simplifying things until I'm back to a basic example (attached).  I'm assuming there is an issue with trying to explore or animate a function that uses a system object, and am wondering if there is an apoproach that works with such structures.  I'm not a Maple jock by any means.

simple_bode.mw

thanks,

Brian

something I always wondered about. On Maple website it says

Notice the date above., December 26.

On my Maple, with latest update, same version is printed, but the date is way off.

It says December 2, not 26.

Why is that? Should not the date be the same sicne same version 1840 of Physics update?

Download physics_version.mw

I like the scrollable vectors up to a point. They seem to be unnecessarly width restricted. Is there any way to increase this? Could anything be added to the .ini file as the is an entry in there to disable them?

Also, if the command is entered again it is ok

I’ve spent considerable effort trying to understand how the solution was derived, particularly the approach involving the factoring of G′/G. Despite my attempts, the methodology remains elusive. It seems there’s an innovative idea at play here—something beyond the techniques we’ve applied in similar problems before. While I suspect it involves a novel perspective, I can’t quite pinpoint what it might be.

If anyone has insights into how this factoring is achieved or can shed light on the underlying idea, I’d greatly appreciate your help.

Download problem99.mw

Download dynamics_of_novel_disease_outbreak.mw