Maple documents appear to be an excellent way of documenting problems and procedures, and notetaking in general, but I have always found them laborious and frequently encountered problems with formatting. One may as well use Tex. This is the reason that I was struck by the ability of the GenerateDocument() procedure in the NaturalLanguage package to create Maple documents.

Is there any practical way to use NaturalLanguage for notetaking and documentation of procedures. By this I mean, the ability to input math and or explanatory text and request(direct) the AI to produce a maple document.

Suppose I have a metric g, and I want to perform a conformal transformation g = exp(2Phi(X))*g, is there a straightforward way to do this for curvature quantitieies (Christoffel, Ricci Scalar etc)? I was able to do it rather easily for the Christoffel symbols, as seen below, but it required me making a substitution for each index pair. While this isn't horrible, it would be nice if there was a way to do it without this procedure.

** Edited to make it Phi(X) 

Any thoughts appreciated, thank you!

MyConformal.mw

Hello everyone!
I have had an issue for the past weeks, where it seems like Maple has a problem identifying the correct units and also sometimes having an issue with defining a variable.

In the picture below you can see I have defined rho, m and tried to Solve V. I get m^3, which is fine but I cannot change the unit in the right bar (see picture).

I even tried to just take square root of my V to see if I could then change units. It seems like it thinks I'm playing with weight.
I even had 2 teachers trying to help me find a solution, without luck.

I have tried executing the whole document and also only bits of the document without luck.

Does anyone know this problem and has a solution?

Thanks in advance! 

- Jacob

For the derivation of the results that I need for my research, I use advanced calculus, special functions etc.

Consider a derivation of the form LHS = RHS1 = ... RHSn.

Suppose that I have a LaTeX file describing this derivation, with fine details of the derivation in notes written using pencil on paper. 

To check this derivation for errors, such as a wrong sign, I could retype LHS and RHSn into Maple and check for equality using symbolic algebra.

To provide a more detailed check of this derivation, I could type LHS, RHS1, ..., RHSn into Maple and check the sequence equalities LHS = RHS1, ..., RHS(n-1) = RHSn using symbolic algebra.

However, this is a laborious and, itself, an error-prone process.

Is there some way of submitting my LaTeX file (or its compiled version) and/or an image of my handwritten notes for checking by Maple, line-by-line, using symbolic algebra?

I'm not sure exactly when this started but maple on one of my linux machines won't print more than one row of a matrix. I get dots like this:

Note that interface(rtablesize) is [10,10]. This happens with both maple2024 and maple2025. 

On any of my other machines, maple works just fine. I have also tried deleting ~/.maple and ~/.maplesoft

Any idea why Maple dsolve can't find solution to this ode? From textbook

The strange thing, it solves if it asked for implicit solution. But the default, will give no solution.

Is this a defect? Should it not have returned the book solution automatically?   How is a user supposed to know the ode has a solution or not, if default call returns no solution?

Download dsolve_gives_no_solution_sept_2_2025.mw

The_Bohrs_Model_-_MaplePrimes.mw

Look at the equation (11) in the Maple's document. I would like to force Maple to let the variable "r" inside the squared root so to get the equation (12). Any idea of doing that?  Thank you in advance for your help.

(2500iw/(1+5iw) )+(200iw/1-10iw)+5 rationalize and simplify

I was surprised that Maple can't solve this first order ode which is exact ode.

I solved by hand and Maple says my solution is correct.

Any one can find why Maple failed to solve this and if older versions can solve it? Also tried implicit option, but that did not help.

Download maple_solving_exact_ode_august_25_2025.mw

As we can see, RealDomain:-solve gives an incorrect solution to the following system: 

Download solve_returns_an_unsatisfiable_real_solution.mw

This appears to be a bug; is it possible to fix it? 
Text: 

sys := diff~(sqrt(2*a^2 - 8*a + 10) + sqrt(b^2 - 6*b + 10) + sqrt(2*a^2 - 2*a*b + b^2), [a, b]):
RealDomain:-solve(sys =~ 0, {a, b});

THis is problem from textbook. Maple do not give solution. 

But when asked for implicit solution, it gives one.  Should it not have done this automatically?

Download why_no_solution_maple_2025_1.mw

We see now there are two solutions for y(x), since quadratic.

So why dsolve do not solve this and at least give implicit solution automatically? Should this be reported as defect?

Any idea why Maple simplifies 1+sin(x)^2 to 2-cos(x)^2?  Leaf count is larger also.

Download strange_simplification_august_20_2025.mw

Attached worksheet

Download internal_error_on_int_august_20_2025_maple_2025_1.mw

Update

fyi, Here is yet another int() error Error, (in type/trig) too many levels of recursion in Maple 2025.1. (also reported to Maplesoft).

Download another_int_error_too_many_levels_maple_2025_1.mw

I can't seem to find the "Stop Execution" symbol with the new Maple 2025.1 GUI.  Does anyone know where it went?

I installed a free trial of Maple 2025, but I can't seem to get the (simple) sample test.java script to run using OpenMaple. It compiles fine, but when I try to run it I get a Segmentation Fault error. I've ensured that the environmental variables, as described in the installation documentation, are given properly. The documentation/example in the installation refers to an old version of Maple, so I wondered if perhaps the free trial version does not have all of the updated components? I was hoping to test my project compatibility with OpenMaple before purchasing Maple.

My OS is Ubuntu 24.04, and I'm using Java 21. It would be nice to get everything running in IntelliJ eventually, but for now even trying to run in the terminal is problematic.