Advanced Search

Maple Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple
View unanswered posts
Maple Questions and Posts Feed

Maple and MapleSim 2024.2 updates

by: TechnicalSupport 810 Maple 2024 , MapleSim 2024
October 31 2024
3  0

We have just released updates to Maple and MapleSim.

Maple 2024.2 includes ability to tear away tabs into new windows, improvements to scrollable matrices, corrections to PDF export, small improvements throughout the math engine, and more.  We recommend that all Maple 2024 users install this update.

This update also include a fix to the problem with the simplify extension mechanism, as first reported on MaplePrimes. Thanks, as always, for helping us make Maple better.

This update is available through Tools>Check for Updates in Maple, and is also available from the Maple 2024.2 download page, where you can find more details.

At the same time, we have also released an update to MapleSim, which contains a variety of improvements to MapleSim and its add-ons. You can find more information on the MapleSim 2024.2 download page.

Content of exported SVG files is always outside th...

Asked by: mafitch 10
export svg
October 31 2024
2  0

When I export images as SVG the resulting file always has the image much larger than the viewbox resulting in only part of it showing. My normal workflow is to then load in Inkscape and correct the error, however, I would love to not have an extra step. Is there any other fix for this?

How do you convert this system of equations into m...

Asked by: GFY 65
matrix ode differential-equations
October 31 2024
0  3

How do you convert this system of equations into matrix form? The decoupling process is performed.Convert the equations into photographs.fuxian1030.mw

Change of coordinates: Are there other ways to loo...

Asked by: C_R 3537
coords
October 31 2024
1  2

What I do at the moment

u-> changecoords(u,[x,y,z],spherical_physics,[r,theta,phi]):
map(%,[x,y,z])
  [r cos(phi) sin(theta), r sin(phi) sin(theta), r cos(theta)]

Any other (preferably shorter) ways to look up transformations defined in ?coords

How do i define a tensor with an equation of three...

Asked by: Steve255 15
tensor differentialgeometry physics
October 30 2024
3  4

I am studying linear operators that have vanishing Nijenhuis Torsion, that is a (1-1) tensor L whose corresponding (1-2) tensor N given by a tensor equation of L (see attached) is identically zero.

I am new to maple, i have used it to plot vector fields and solve systems of equations in the past but i am unfamiliar with the DifferentialGeometry and Physics packages.

Attached is my best effort at solving this problem directly for a simple 2d case without the use of any packages and i am wondering if it is possible to do it all in one line without having to define tensor components one by one.

nijenhuis_torsion.mw

Solving Nonlinear Systems Symbolically in Maple...

Asked by: repromag 15
solve step-by-step
October 30 2024
0  0

How can I use Maple to solve a system of nonlinear equations symbolically and display the steps in the solution?

Standard form ode ...

Asked by: janhardo 760
ode differential-equations duplicate-question
October 30 2024
0  8

Can i get this ode in a "standardform"  ?

verg:= (-delta*eta^2 + alpha*eta)*diff(diff(U(xi), xi), xi) - U(xi)*(2*eta*gamma*theta*(delta*eta - alpha)*U(xi)^2 + eta^2*delta*k^2 + (-alpha*k^2 - 2*delta*k)*eta + 2*k*alpha + delta) = 0;

How to simplify the following term?...

Asked by: Alfred_F 435
step-by-step radical simplification
October 30 2024
1  3

Since the puzzle task "A circle is to be disturbed ..." makes no fun, here is a Maple task:
The term to be simplified step by step:
(2+10/(3*sqrt(3)))^(1/3)+(2-10/(3*sqrt(3)))^(1/3)

How can I use SPECTRA.mla in Maple on Windows?...

Asked by: bathudaide 25
package fgb spectra
October 29 2024
0  12

I have learned that the SPECTRA.mla library can solve SDP problems. I have tried to download and use it, but I am still missing the FGb module

> with(SPECTRA);
> M := Matrix(6, 6, [[10, 1, 0, m[1], -m[3], m[2]], [1, -2*m[1]+27, m[3], -27/2, -m[4], -m[5]], [0, m[3], -2*m[2], m[4], m[5], 0], [m[1], -27/2, m[4], 10, 0, m[6]], [-m[3], -m[4], m[5], 0, -2*m[6], 0], [m[2], -m[5], 0, m[6], 0, 1]]);
> SolveLMI(M);
=> Error, (in SPECTRA:-SolveLMI) `FGb` does not evaluate to a module

 

How can I resolve this issue on a Windows environment, beause I don't see install file for Windows, only MacOS and Linux:

Which of the following is a possible value of 𝑥?...

Asked by: yangtheary 290
gcd recreational-mathematics
October 29 2024
0  4

CUDA - Can I use it to speed up symbolic computati...

Asked by: Calin 10
performance linearalgebra cuda
October 28 2024
2  1

We are working to obtain a fully symbolic dynamic model for a robot. 

Using the CPU (I9-12900K) and 128 GB of DDR5 RAM (5600 MHZ) did not compute a 7x7 Inverse of a symbolic matrix

Is is possible to exploit the CUDA functions to compute it on the GPU? I have a NVidia RTX A6000 (48 GB of DDR6 GPU memory)

I tried this: 

CUDA:-Enable(true)

CUDA: -MatrixInverse(D_Q):

But it does not use the GPU to compute this. 

Maybe I'm doing smth wrong. 

Thank you, 

Calin

2F1 hypergeometric...

Asked by: masa13 15
mathematica import hypergeom
October 28 2024
3  8

Hi

Dear friends, I am a relatively new user and I have a problem in entering and calculating the 2F1 hypergeometric function. My question is how to enter this function in Maple in equations so that Maple recognizes it? Because hypergeom ([1], [2], [3]) Maple itself is a 3-element function, while 2F1 hypergeometric ([1], [2], [3], [4]) is a four-element!

Confusing of methods for odetest?...

Asked by: salim-barzani 1685
ode series differential-equations
October 28 2024
1  11

Almost i did 10 method for this ode equation all of them are succes but this one is giving me some confusing and i am looking for  get my answer, the mothod say if we have the auxilary equation if substitute the solution of this auxilary equation in our series solution then substitute in ode equation must be satisfy but it is not satisfy so when he did assumption for the auxilary equation he say it satisfy if we sabstitute this assumption in our series solution!

My question is this how we get thus assumption ? and why finding exact  solution of auxilary equation not satisfy?

> 

restart
> 

with(PDEtools)
> 

with(LinearAlgebra)
> 

with(Physics)
> 

with(SolveTools)
> 

undeclare(prime)

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

 (1)
> 

NULL
> 

Fode := (-delta*eta^2+alpha*eta)*(diff(diff(U(xi), xi), xi))-U(xi)*(2*eta*gamma*theta*(delta*eta-alpha)*U(xi)^2+eta^2*delta*k^2+(-alpha*k^2-2*delta*k)*eta+2*k*alpha+delta) = 0

(-delta*eta^2+alpha*eta)*(diff(diff(U(xi), xi), xi))-U(xi)*(2*gamma*eta*theta*(delta*eta-alpha)*U(xi)^2+eta^2*delta*k^2+(-alpha*k^2-2*delta*k)*eta+2*k*alpha+delta) = 0

 (2)
> 

NULL
> 

F := sum(a[i]*G(xi)^i, i = 0 .. 1)

a[0]+a[1]*G(xi)

 (3)

``

 (4)
> 

D1 := diff(F, xi)

a[1]*(diff(G(xi), xi))

 (5)
> 

NULL
> 

S := (diff(G(xi), xi))^2 = G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1]

(diff(G(xi), xi))^2 = G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1]

 (6)
> 

S1 := diff(G(xi), xi) = sqrt(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])

diff(G(xi), xi) = (G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (7)
> 

E1 := subs(S1, D1)

a[1]*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (8)
> 

D2 := diff(E1, xi)

(1/2)*a[1]*(4*G(xi)^3*(diff(G(xi), xi))+2*A[2]*G(xi)*(diff(G(xi), xi)))/(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (9)
> 

E2 := subs(S1, D2)

(1/2)*a[1]*(4*G(xi)^3*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)+2*A[2]*G(xi)*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2))/(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (10)
> 

K := U(xi) = F

U(xi) = a[0]+a[1]*G(xi)

 (11)
> 

K1 := diff(U(xi), xi) = E1

diff(U(xi), xi) = a[1]*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (12)
> 

K2 := diff(U(xi), xi, xi) = E2

diff(diff(U(xi), xi), xi) = (1/2)*a[1]*(4*G(xi)^3*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)+2*A[2]*G(xi)*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2))/(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (13)
> 

L := eval(Fode, {K, K1, K2})

(1/2)*(-delta*eta^2+alpha*eta)*a[1]*(4*G(xi)^3*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)+2*A[2]*G(xi)*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2))/(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)-(a[0]+a[1]*G(xi))*(2*gamma*eta*theta*(delta*eta-alpha)*(a[0]+a[1]*G(xi))^2+eta^2*delta*k^2+(-alpha*k^2-2*delta*k)*eta+2*k*alpha+delta) = 0

 (14)
> 

L1 := normal((1/2)*(-delta*eta^2+alpha*eta)*a[1]*(4*G(xi)^3*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)+2*A[2]*G(xi)*(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2))/(G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)-(a[0]+a[1]*G(xi))*(2*gamma*eta*theta*(delta*eta-alpha)*(a[0]+a[1]*G(xi))^2+eta^2*delta*k^2+(-alpha*k^2-2*delta*k)*eta+2*k*alpha+delta) = 0)
> 

 

> 

collect(L1, {G(xi)})

(-2*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[1]^3+2*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[1]^3-2*delta*eta^2*a[1]+2*alpha*eta*a[1])*G(xi)^3+(-6*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[0]*a[1]^2+6*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[0]*a[1]^2)*G(xi)^2+(-6*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[0]^2*a[1]+6*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[0]^2*a[1]-delta*eta^2*k^2*a[1]+alpha*eta*k^2*a[1]-delta*eta^2*A[2]*a[1]+alpha*eta*A[2]*a[1]+2*delta*eta*k*a[1]-2*alpha*k*a[1]-delta*a[1])*G(xi)-2*gamma*delta*eta^2*theta*a[0]^3+2*gamma*alpha*eta*theta*a[0]^3-delta*eta^2*k^2*a[0]+alpha*eta*k^2*a[0]+2*delta*eta*k*a[0]-2*alpha*k*a[0]-delta*a[0] = 0

 (15)
> 

eq0 := -2*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[0]^3+2*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[0]^3-delta*eta^2*k^2*a[0]+alpha*eta*k^2*a[0]+2*delta*eta*k*a[0]-2*alpha*k*a[0]-delta*a[0] = 0
> 

eq1 := -6*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[0]^2*a[1]+6*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[0]^2*a[1]-delta*eta^2*k^2*a[1]+alpha*eta*k^2*a[1]-delta*eta^2*A[2]*a[1]+alpha*eta*A[2]*a[1]+2*delta*eta*k*a[1]-2*alpha*k*a[1]-delta*a[1] = 0
> 

eq2 := -6*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[0]*a[1]^2+6*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[0]*a[1]^2 = 0
> 

eq3 := -2*delta*eta^2*gamma*theta*a[1]^3+2*alpha*eta*gamma*theta*a[1]^3-2*delta*eta^2*a[1]+2*alpha*eta*a[1] = 0
> 

COEFFS := solve({eq0, eq1, eq2, eq3}, {alpha, eta, a[0], a[1]}, explicit)
> 

case1 := COEFFS[4]

{alpha = delta*(eta^2*k^2+eta^2*A[2]-2*eta*k+1)/(eta*k^2+eta*A[2]-2*k), eta = eta, a[0] = 0, a[1] = 1/(-gamma*theta)^(1/2)}

 (16)
> 

NULL
> 

S

(diff(G(xi), xi))^2 = G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1]

 (17)
> 

S1

diff(G(xi), xi) = (G(xi)^4+A[2]*G(xi)^2+A[1])^(1/2)

 (18)
> 

S2 := dsolve(S, G(xi))

G(xi) = -(1/2)*(-2*A[2]-2*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2))^(1/2), G(xi) = (1/2)*(-2*A[2]-2*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2))^(1/2), G(xi) = -(1/2)*(2*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)-2*A[2])^(1/2), G(xi) = (1/2)*(2*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)-2*A[2])^(1/2), G(xi) = JacobiSN((1/2)*(2*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)-2*A[2])^(1/2)*xi+c__1, (-2*(A[2]*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)-A[2]^2+2*A[1])*A[1])^(1/2)/(A[2]*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)-A[2]^2+2*A[1]))*A[1]*2^(1/2)/(A[1]*(-A[2]+(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)))^(1/2)

 (19)
> 

K

U(xi) = a[0]+a[1]*G(xi)

 (20)
> 

K4 := subs(case1, K)

U(xi) = G(xi)/(-gamma*theta)^(1/2)

 (21)
> 

NULL
> 

K5 := subs(S2, K4)

U(xi) = -(1/2)*(-2*A[2]-2*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2))^(1/2)/(-gamma*theta)^(1/2)

 (22)
> 

NULL
> 

F2 := subs(case1, Fode)

(-eta^2*delta+delta*(eta^2*k^2+eta^2*A[2]-2*eta*k+1)*eta/(eta*k^2+eta*A[2]-2*k))*(diff(diff(U(xi), xi), xi))-U(xi)*(2*gamma*eta*theta*(delta*eta-delta*(eta^2*k^2+eta^2*A[2]-2*eta*k+1)/(eta*k^2+eta*A[2]-2*k))*U(xi)^2+eta^2*delta*k^2+(-k^2*delta*(eta^2*k^2+eta^2*A[2]-2*eta*k+1)/(eta*k^2+eta*A[2]-2*k)-2*k*delta)*eta+2*k*delta*(eta^2*k^2+eta^2*A[2]-2*eta*k+1)/(eta*k^2+eta*A[2]-2*k)+delta) = 0

 (23)

``

 (24)
> 

NULL
> 

odetest(K5, F2)

-(1/2)*delta*eta*(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2)*(-2*(A[2]+(A[2]^2-4*A[1])^(1/2))/gamma)^(1/2)/((eta*k^2+eta*A[2]-2*k)*(-theta)^(1/2))

 (25)


and i hope mapleprimes don't delete this question becuase of this pictures also it help for undrestanding

 

there is other picture for different auxilary equation just  add one multiply term for G(xi)^4 in case anyone needed i will upload

Download odetest.mw

Why not apear all term when i export file of maple...

Asked by: salim-barzani 1685
matrix vector pdf
October 27 2024
1  3

how fixed that?

> 

NULL
> 

restart
> 

NULL
> 

A := Vector[row]([4, 0, 5])

Vector[row](%id = 36893490313998292860)

 (1)
> 

B := Vector[row]([3, 1, 0])

Vector[row](%id = 36893490313998279372)

 (2)
> 

C := Vector[row]([2, 1, 1])

Vector[row](%id = 36893490313998273820)

 (3)
> 

C.`&x`(A, B)

9

 (4)
> 

NULL

Download we.mw

How can we generate solutions for an ODE using con...

Asked by: salim-barzani 1685
ode parameters dsolve
October 26 2024
0  6

In many papers, I've noticed that the solution to an ODE (ordinary differential equation) often emerges directly when there's only a single function involved. My question is: is there a way to generate solutions to an ODE by producing specific parameters?

 

> 

restart
> 

with(PDEtools)
> 

with(LinearAlgebra)
> 

with(Physics)
> 

with(SolveTools)
> 

undeclare(prime)

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

 (1)
> 

NULL
> 

S := diff(F(xi), xi) = sqrt(P*F(xi)^4+Q*F(xi)^2+R)

diff(F(xi), xi) = (P*F(xi)^4+Q*F(xi)^2+R)^(1/2)

 (2)
> 

S1 := dsolve(S, F(xi))

xi-Intat(1/(P*_a^4+Q*_a^2+R)^(1/2), _a = F(xi))+c__1 = 0

 (3)
> 

S2 := (diff(F(xi), xi))^2 = P*F(xi)^4+Q*F(xi)^2+R

(diff(F(xi), xi))^2 = P*F(xi)^4+Q*F(xi)^2+R

 (4)
> 

S3 := dsolve(S2, F(xi))

F(xi) = -(1/2)*(-2*P*(Q+(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)))^(1/2)/P, F(xi) = (1/2)*(-2*P*(Q+(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)))^(1/2)/P, F(xi) = -(1/2)*2^(1/2)*(P*(-Q+(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)))^(1/2)/P, F(xi) = (1/2)*2^(1/2)*(P*(-Q+(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)))^(1/2)/P, F(xi) = JacobiSN((1/2)*(2*(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)-2*Q)^(1/2)*xi+c__1, (-2*(Q*(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)+2*R*P-Q^2)*R*P)^(1/2)/(Q*(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)+2*R*P-Q^2))*R*2^(1/2)/(R*(-Q+(-4*P*R+Q^2)^(1/2)))^(1/2)

 (5)
 

NULL

Download get_all_solution_of_ode_by_generation.mw

First 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Last Page 77 of 2231