After starting Maple

I then tried simpler prompts like "Hello", simplify(x),...

For all prompts I get the same error message.
I am not a frequent AI user but this is the first time I see that.
Has anybody else experienced the same?

Can someone send me a prompt that should work?

(Model type was Simple.)

Update:

It seems that this error occurs, when a second instance of Maple 2026.1 is started and AI is consulted in this instance. 

To D(ln@cosh) I have to add an argument to make it work (Edit: no output returned):

D(ln@cosh)(x);
                            sinh(x)
                            -------
                            cosh(x)

According to ?D I expected output according to this

I am only occasionally using Maple versions with the new ribon user interface and noticed about 2 weeks ago that I cannot interrupt for loops under these interfaces. For example this one

for i to 1000 do
    i^i;
end do

I re-run the code today (after installing windows updates) and could interrupt before the screen was filled with output but not after executing the code a second time (without restart).

Is that reproducible on other installations?

Are there other commands that cannot be interrupted? 
If that is known, are there workarounds?

Update:
I have restarted Maple and have two worksheets open with the same code. I can repeatedly interrupt in one worksheet but not in other

Given is a list of equations where the lhs is a name and the rhs an expression (i.e. list(name=algebraic).

I want to pass that list to a procedure and then assign locally the names to the values on the rhs. Similar to passing options in Maple commands (e.g. plot option numpoints=n).

The below, the example throws an error

restart;
foo := proc(params) 
local names; 
names := lhs~(params)[]; 
#local op(names);
print([names]):
assign(params); 
print(b, c, d); end proc;

foo([b = 2, c = 3, d = 4]);
foo([b = 2, c = 3, d = 4]); #  error because the assignement was done to global names

How to fix that and/or avoid assignements to global names

For a numericial integration I want to check if all physical parameters are given in SI base units (before stripping of the units for the integration). Right now I am doing this

Download check_for_SI_base_units.mw

I am interested in simpler ways to perform the test. The statement is quite long and not easy to understand.

Given the size of the unit package, there might be a command that I have overlooked to check whether units are in SI base units.

Have I missed test cases to make the check fool proof?

Update: A variant with split was added and attempts with functional programming

check_for_SI_base_units_02.mw