Why are upvotes and downvotes shown separately?  If a question/post is disliked by a lot of people, it should show up as 'negative' (like it does on MathOverflow).  And it should affect people's reputation too!  People who ask sufficiently bad questions (and enough of them) should receive this feedback from the community.  It's what makes the community self-policing!

I suggest that the suggestions for tags that are currently listed be turned off.  This is because they are generally really bad and off-topic (and probably swallow all sorts of CPU time needlessly...).  I much prefer the auto-complete feature in *Overflow for tags (as well as a good list of common ones).

And why does it always suggest to me the tag academic?

The questions do not list 'MaplePrimes' as a possible topic.  And the Post does have (under MaplePrimes Suggestion), as well as talking about "Have a problem with MaplePrimes?" which sure sounds like a question!  So I don't get what the intended difference is.  It made a certain amount of sense in the previous version of Primes, but now that's *Overflow-like, I'm not sure if the distinction makes much sense anymore.

I used to really enjoy reading mapleprimes and answer questions.  It was fun.  There were challenging questions, and some rather interesting design discussions.

And then I got bored.  I am not totally sure exactly why.  In some ways, I think the density of challenging questions went down.  Well, that's perhaps not quite right either -- the density of new (challenging) questions went down.

Try to typeset

normal(1/((omega^Omega/a-1/2)[a,sqrt(2)][1/2]-(zeta+iota)[-y][-1,1]+(xi+Xi)[alpha[1/2]]));

in your favourite version of Maple. What's the "best" way to typeset this in LaTeX so that it looks 'best'? The renderer here on primes gives:-1/(-(omega^Omega/a-1/2)[a,2^(1/2)][1/2]+(zeta+iota)[-y][-1,1]-(xi+Xi)[alpha[1/2]])

It's fairly ugly, but at least the baseline alignments seem to be ok, even though the fonts are way too small (and fuzzy too).