@zia9206314 

Being entire, HeunT has only infinity as singularity, except when it reduces to a polynomial (and this happens for certain values of the parameters, see the help page).

I don't know if/when HeunT can be expressed via hypergeom.

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

So you have approximated 1/2 by 12/23.
Still, in the unit disc should be about 1333 points and there are 1448.
If you want to use this repartition instead of an exact one, it's OK.

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

You use improperly "unbased words" instead of "I need an explanation for ...".

In this case, f: [u,v]  |-->  [sqrt(u)*cos(v),  sqrt(u)*sin(v)]  has the Jacobian 1/2, so
area(f(D)) = 1/2 * area(D).

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

Because the mapping  [u,v]  |-->  [sqrt(u)*cos(v),  sqrt(u)*sin(v)]  is area preserving (modulo a constant),
which is not the case with  [u,v]  |-->  [u*cos(v),  u*sin(v)] .

PS. Thank you for the link. BTW, Robert Israel is one of the most remarkable scientists I ever met (unfortunately not personally); it's a pitty that he is not active any more in this forum.

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

You forgot to execute the first part which defines r.

You said first

... codes includes the verification of the incidence to the region (the tringle or ellipse).

wrongly and without any explanation.

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

And I understand that you have objections for the ellipse too. Please explain.

@Markiyan Hirnyk

Of course.
The mapping (x,y) -> `if`(x+y<1, [x,y],[1-x,1-y])   applies the square [0,1]^2 onto a standard triangle similar to the mentioned Dirichlet distribution.

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

My code does not use incidence verification. It constructs effectively area preserving mappings just like Mathematica.

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

@Heitor 

It was just a joke, probably not a good one.

@torabi 

A general advise (at least for the future): it is a good idea to present mathematically the problem.  Otherwise what alternative method are you hoping for? It would imply a "reverse engineering" of your computations and probably nobody will want to spend his time for this. E.g. probably Runge-Kutta makes sense for the original problem, but not for the system you have presented.

@ecterrab 

What is the performance impact of Assume? After Physics:-Assume(...), Maple seems to use more memory.
It would be interesting to know why this operating mode was not included in the standard assume command (maybe via a kernelopts(assume) switch).

If you want to suppress the output for .txt use colon (:) after read
see also ?interface,echo

To use assumptions in .m file save `property/object` as mentioned in the answer.

@Kitonum 

Please try the version:

f := proc(u)
     local M:=convert(u,list);
     `if`(LinearAlgebra:-Determinant(Matrix(4,M)) mod 2 <>0, cat(M[]), NULL)
     end;
P:=Iterator:-CartesianProduct([seq(0..1)]$16, compile = false):
GROUP:=seq(f(M),M=P):   
nops([GROUP]);

which disables the compilation, and see if it works for you. It is just a little slower.

But you should try to solve the compiler problem, see ?compiler

@Carl Love 

GL(2,64) has > 1.6*10^7 elements.

But note that the methods here produce incorrect results for a non-prime q.