Hello,

I'd like to clean up my project a bit. In a chapter of a project I made lots of calculations and declared a many (30) variabeles (Table, Numeric, Formula, ..)

Is there a way to remove all variable's except specified one's? (If it is possible I don't want to use an external file to write it to and read it back after a restart)

Is there a way to do a "restart" and preserve only the one's (2) that I need for my next chapter?
Or if not, without a "restart" and remove all variables except specified one's?

Thanks for your help, 

What’s the simplest way to solve an algebraic equation in the complex domain?

For example,

I*(a+3*b)+2*b+5*a = 3+2*I

where a and b are real numbers.

I'm brand new to Maple and was assigned a problem to modify a code provided by my professor to incorporate variable window size. However, I don't know where to begin or what I'm doing. I've attached the link to the problem below. Plz help.  NA1_Project_IDW_01.2014_Fall.pdf

Hi, I've written some matrix computation in maple 18 . I wanna open this file in maple 16 ? how is it possible ? any help is appreciated in advance.

M:=Array([[a+2*b,b],[x1+y1,z1+z2]]);
pars:=indets(M);
npars:=numelems(pars);

myRand:=RandomTools[Generate](float(range=-3..3),makeproc=true):

set1:={seq(pars[i]=myRand(),i=1..npars)};
numM:=subs(set1,M);
LinearAlgebra:-Rank(numM);

is there a way to make sure that the random values generated from myRand(), subs into M, to make sure that each cell of M is between 0 and 1?

Basically, what I need is being able to simulate some values, subject to each cell of M is between 0 and 1, and find the rank of M. I want to do that efficiently 20 times (or more possibly). Those values that make the cells out of 0 and 1 do not count as 1 of the 20 simulations.

Thanks,

casper

Mytest:=module()
    option package;
    
    export
        mymain
        ;
        
        
    # local a,b,c;

    uses LinearAlgebra;
    
    interface(rtablesize=infinity);
    
    
    mymain:=proc(n::integer)

        local ans;
        
        ans:=Vector(n);

        return ans;

    end proc;

end module;

Here is a short piece of code to create a Maple package. It runs fine. Is that possible to hide the code from print() ?

with(Mytest);

print(mymain); # which displays the source code

Could I hide some of the code? Say I want to use the function mymain() for debugging purpose, but I dont want to make it local to the package. Instead I keep it in "export", but I dont want users to see its code.

Thanks!

Hey guys,

i'd like to create a custom component for maplesim. I opened the template in maple18 and defined the following equations:

eq := [p(t) = p__0+rho*g*h(t), Q(t) = A*(diff(h(t), t)), L(t) = 100*h(t)/h(0)]

These equations describes a tank with a liquid in it. Now I tried to define a function L(t) (above) that gives the level of the tank in percentage. Therefore I need the initial height value at t=0. The function defined above (h(0)) does not work, cause maple tells me that the function does not exist.

Any hint how to get an initial value or a value at t=0? Or maybe another way to solve my problem?

Hopefully I described right. :-)

Best regards

Christian

Hi everyone.

I wrote simple program with several functions. I would like to obtain parallel computing of my functions. I can't understand how to use nodes.

My programm.

Simple_example.mw

Say for a complicated function f(x), there are 10 solutions. I want to check for any of the solutions, the matrix R is defined or not.

Is there a way to force execution like the following ones?

seq(1/i,i=0..3);

for i from 0 to 3 do
    1/i;
end do;

I think the problem is that, Maple stops immediately when it's undefined. But the following terms could be defined.

Or is there a way to put this check into "solve"? That's

> solve(f(x),x, "some way of making sure that the solution has to be defined for the matrix R" )

Is there a way to achieve this?

Thanks

Hi guys.

I have variables that look like C[i,j,k,l], where i,j,k,l can range between 1..3 for example. Is there a simple way to create a pattern-based assumption for something like C[i,j,k,l] = C[j,i,k,l] for all i,j,k,l ?

Kind regards,

woggy

int(int(y, 0 <= y, x^2+y^2+z^2 <= 1));

Error, (in int) integration range or variable must be specified in the second argument, got 0 <= y

int(int(y, y = 0, x^2+y^2+z^2 = 1));

Error, (in int) integration range or variable must be specified in the second argument, got y = 0

@ecterrab 

I figured I'd start a new thread for odd things I come across whilst using the new physics package. 

I have found this, and am not sure if it is expected. 

Download Simplify2.mw

Take a look at below. I was expecting maple to give me "g'(1)"! :)

Good afternoon sir.

I request your kind suggestion to my cited query.

With thanks & Regards

M.Anand

Assistant Professor in Mathematics

SR International Institute of Technology,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

I am a research student and I am writing up my thesis. I was reading one of the paper written earlier by authors in 2003.

The authors calculated a symbolic rank of a matrix A, and got 9, using Maple 6.

Then new methods developed in 2012 and proved that the "true" rank should be 8. The later paper that "Most  recent versions of Maple have this simplification built in and are able to return a rank of 8.".

I just noticed that in Maple 18.01, this matrix was still evaluted for a symbolic rank 9, if no simplifcaiton was done before using Rank(), see attached.

I didnt explore a lot, but just as a notice. I am a bit concerned as most of my research was trying to deal with exponentials.

Is that something to be fixed in future versions?

Thanks!

 Bug.mw