Advanced Search

Question: Is it really better? with(Threads)

Question:Is it really better? with(Threads)

casperyc 962 Maple 17
seq threads
May 09 2013
0

Hi all,

I just learned about the with(Threads) package and I wanted to do a bit testing and see if it's 'faster' or more 'efficient'.

Test.pdf

 

This was done on a i7 940X (QuardCore) laptop.

I dont really see how it is better in a sense?

Or am I using Seq for the wrong purpose?

 

Casper
Please Wait...