## 5816 Reputation

19 years, 106 days
Munich, Bavaria, Germany

## manually...

I marked it with the mouse and changed it through the menu bar (without further testing)

## digits?...

Are you sure about RefineRoot? The help gives me the impression that it is for finding approximative roots.

Edit: I see, it brackets a root

## I see...

 > # https://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/237846-How-Can-I-Go-From-The-Lhs-To-The-Rhs
 > The first one is piecewise(u <= v, u, v < u, v);
 (1)
 > It means to pick the smaller one of u and v, so it is min(u,v)
 (2)
 > The second one is puzzling [piecewise(u <= 1 - v, 0, 1 - v < u, u + v - 1)];
 (3)
 > Make the Ansatz u+v-1 = a and simplify   ``=eval(%, u = a-v+1); # u+v-1 = a simplify(%);
 (4)
 > which obviously is max(0,a)
 (5)

## ok...

@vv Thanks - that solves it

## trapped by numerics...

I was trapped by numerics it seems

[seq(10.0^(20*n), n=2 .. 14)]:
[seq(expr, x in %)]:
evalf[1000](%): evalf[3](%);
[        64          104          144         183         223
[-3.22 10  , -1.79 10   , -2.18 10   , 9.38 10   , 3.02 10   ,

263         303         343         383         423
-1.08 10   , 3.41 10   , 1.07 10   , 2.35 10   , 3.16 10   ,

462          503          543]
-3.26 10   , -1.96 10   , -3.39 10   ]

## remark aside...

It's not a bug, just the rationalized form of yours. And you will need to sum up to ~ 10^11 I think

## do you mean 'dismantle' ?...

p:=c*(a+b); dismantle(p);

or

ToInert(p); FromInert(%);

## trackers...

@mcouture Adblockers and Anti-Tracking are natural for educated web users expecting privacy. And there is a lot of snooping on https://www.maplesoft.com/Applications/ However the site can be used if anti tracking is configured with care (and time for that).

## 2017.3...

@Kitonum acer's approach works in 2017.3

`x^x=1/sqrt(2); map(ln, %); solve(%);`

## double integral...

Why do you think the double integral equals Pi?

And: how do you want Dirac( g(x) ) to be understood?

## same in Maple 2023.2...

same in Maple 2023.2

## hm ......

@WA573 I do not see how your imgae relates to your sheet, so I ignore that.

For you sheet: as Carl Love already explained above your assumption(s) silently imply something

limit(y2, t=infinity) assuming (lambda1::real, lambda2::real) is answered to be lambda1 + lambda2 and not depending on n, so y3 = LREtools:-delta(y2, n) is zero, hence y4 is a for that assumption

## what is the actual question...

So what is your actual question - how to compute the limit for y in your posted image? Using Maple or manually?

## hm ......

Roughly you want f(x,y) = 4 and f(x,y) = 5. Could that be a typo?

## sorry...

@Preben Alsholm It was thought for Hahn Hahn, not as critics on your post, I correct that. Sorry for being unclear.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 207
﻿