Dear @Rouben Rostamian and @mmcdara thank for you great and sucessful effort. I strongly recommend your way of solution. 

I am still looking for numerical solution of current model @Rouben Rostamian ,@mmcdara  and @Preben Alsholm . 

Thank you 

@Markiyan Hirnyk  thanks for your kind answer but i am looking for exact solution or any kind of semi analytical solution. 

@Markiyan Hirnyk please follow this link you can find PDF.

http://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.cc/science/article/pii/S1468121811003221

Equation (5) with BC (6)

@Markiyan Hirnyk yes exactly  

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications 13 (2012) 1498–1505 
Equation (5) with BC (6)

@Markiyan Hirnyk 

This is kind of corneal shape model. if i can get the exact solution tehn i can verify with any of numerical solution. I already determine the numerical results.

No doubt, 

Maple working is much faster as compare as mathematica. coz i am using mathematica since last few years and just switch to maple recently... i guess maple working is much better as compare as mathematica but numerical point of view maple is little bit weaker then mathematica...

Every thing what i ask and all conversations related to my questions. 

Every thing what i ask and all conversations related to my questions. 

i did't found any un-subscriptions button

i did't found any un-subscriptions button

it is working now. thanks

it is working now. thanks

what do u think Present Bcs are correct here the cofficent of D(T)(0) is function of T(x) again.....it should be numeric

@J4James looking out standing graphs, if i mention a related article for same problem will you please help me?????