Thank you for bringing this to our attention @nm. The Maple Math Library group are investigating, we'll let the thread know what they determine.

The team were able to correct the link in a future verion of Maple, thank you for bringing it to our attention. 

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The fix that was first made available through a Physics update is now also available through the Maple 2024.2 update.

As mentioned previously, a fix for this weakness has been incorporated into Maple 2024.1. Please see https://www.mapleprimes.com/maplesoftblog/226263-Updates-To-Maple-2024-And-MapleSim-2024?sp=226263 for details. 

As mentioned previously, a fix has been incorporated into the Maple 2024.1 update. See https://www.mapleprimes.com/maplesoftblog/226263-Updates-To-Maple-2024-And-MapleSim-2024?sp=226263 for details. 

Hi @nm, there is some relevant information in the description section of the ?NaturalLanguage,RawQuery help article in Maple 2024 about the available models and how they can be changed, as well as the following:

Note: Large language models often generate inaccurate statements. Please keep this in mind: this is not technology for building a bridge with.

Hi @willysw,

We're sorry about the trouble with Maple Flow. You mention saving the canvas and quitting. Would you be able to send us this or another example canvas file some time? We can't see anything recursive in your screenshot, and a partial screenshot is difficult to troubleshoot, but Flow is typically able to handle recursive definitions:

recursive.flow

Unfortunately, evaluation can't be disabled by default in Maple Flow 2023.3; but the Flow team will consider this improvement for future versions.

Hello again @nm ,

We’re sorry to hear you are still experiencing problems, and we would like to investigate. There are things we can do to try to identify the cause and possible fixes on your particular machine. If you would like to proceed, please open a support request at https://www.maplesoft.com/contact/webforms/support.aspx

Apologies for the delay, everyone. For posterity of the thread: Our developers found that,

> solve( convert(int(f(x) - g(x), x = C .. E), rational) = 3, E); works, returning a generic RootOf pretty quickly

Hello @nm, 

We're sorry to hear you're having kernel connection issues. Unfortunately, kernel connection losses can happen for a variety of reasons as described in our article, 'Kernel connection has been lost' error in Maple. The 2023.2.1 update fixed one cause. Could you please open a support request from https://www.maplesoft.com/contact/webforms/support.aspx so we can work together to understand the cause for you?

We'll start by asking if your KCL errors happen reliably after the same commands and if you've been able to save a worksheet, if you've tried a complete re-installation of Maple 2023.2.1, etc. and go from there. 

Thank you for posting your question on MaplePrimes, Ron.

We're reaching out to you by email and will take it from there.

Hello, we've received the SCRs about RowEchelonTransform and our R&D team are looking into it. Thank you for the feedback.

[Update Nov 30, 2023] The team agrees there is an inaccuracy in the help page, and will consider improvements to future versions of Maple help. 

Thanks for bringing this to our attention, @C_R and @vv. We'll look into improvements in future versions. 

This problem has been fixed in the Maple 2023.2 update. Thanks for letting us know.

Does the article mention where or if the package was shared publicly?

If this is the same article,

https://faculty.ecnu.edu.cn/picture/article/202/db/d4/629bf84944d7a0d604c2616722a9/692e3483-0826-40b0-a24a-c0a31899aecc.pdf

There doesn't seem to be any mention of how it is/was shared. The authors might have to provide access to it.