## 754 Reputation

11 years, 152 days

## your representation of integration is co...

@itsme actucally evaluating it gives you the wrong answer , since maple approximate your function with sum of some terms .
what u said about sum , is differenet ! maple approximate your function with a series ( maybe loran) , but sum and Sum are different with this one as far as i know.

## see the link...

maybe u can find sth similiar in this link :

http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/201246-How-To-Solve-For-M

## hint...

@mehdi jafari as u can see in the simplification there is a summaition , i think when we simplify f , it approxmiate the f with sum finite terms and thus ,the integration are corrected ! so there is nothing wrong with maple integration,the problem is with approximation terms of f .

## u have asked this question before !...

actually i do not know why maple can solve wave equation using laplace method, but not this one !

 (1)

 (2)

 (3)

 (4)

## maybe u should repeat the same code for ...

@xcyborg maybe u should repeat the same code for those output,since it takes a lot of time for me to understand your code fuly. good luck

## no there is nothing with maple wrong !...

@xcyborg i added one more column,

 Factory Simulation: Ghana Chocolates Chocolate Factory Simulation Project .     W    O(t,t+1)        B(t)        T(t)        F(t)        R(t)    M(t,t+1)     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------     1         50.         50.        250.        250.        150.        50.        2        100.        100.        200.        200.        200.        50.        3          0.          0.        300.        300.         50.        50.        4         50.         50.          0.          0.        400.        50.        5         50.        100.        125.        125.        325.        50.        6         50.         50.        120.        120.        280.        50.        7         50.         50.        117.        117.        283.        50.        8         50.         50.        114.        114.        286.        50.        9         50.         50.        112.        112.        288.        50.       10         50.         50.        111.        111.        289.        50.       11         50.         50.        110.        110.        290.        50.       12         50.         50.        109.        109.        291.        50.       13         50.         50.        108.        108.        292.        50.       14         50.         50.        108.        108.        292.        50.       15         50.         50.        107.        107.        293.        50.       16         50.         50.        107.        107.        293.        50.     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------     W          50     1040/21          50       ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

## nice try...

@lemelinm good luck! happy to hear u have solevd the problem.

## the way is the same...

 > restart:with(plots):
 > x := [seq]( (1/5)*i,i=0..12);  #  x[i] the x-coordinate
 >
 >
 > y := [seq]( (1/5)*j,j=0..12); # y[j] the y-coordinate
 >
 >
 > t := [seq]( (1/5)*k,k=0..12);  #  t[k] the t-coordinate
 >
 x := [0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 6/5, 7/5, 8/5, 9/5, 2, 11/5, 12/5]
 y := [0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 6/5, 7/5, 8/5, 9/5, 2, 11/5, 12/5]
 t := [0, 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, 1, 6/5, 7/5, 8/5, 9/5, 2, 11/5, 12/5] (1)
 > Tab:=seq(seq(seq([x[i],y[j],t[k]],i=1..3),j=1..3),k=1..3);
 Tab := [0, 0, 0], [1/5, 0, 0], [2/5, 0, 0], [0, 1/5, 0], [1/5, 1/5, 0], [2/5, 1/5, 0], [0, 2/5, 0], [1/5, 2/5, 0], [2/5, 2/5, 0], [0, 0, 1/5], [1/5, 0, 1/5], [2/5, 0, 1/5], [0, 1/5, 1/5], [1/5, 1/5, 1/5], [2/5, 1/5, 1/5], [0, 2/5, 1/5], [1/5, 2/5, 1/5], [2/5, 2/5, 1/5], [0, 0, 2/5], [1/5, 0, 2/5], [2/5, 0, 2/5], [0, 1/5, 2/5], [1/5, 1/5, 2/5], [2/5, 1/5, 2/5], [0, 2/5, 2/5], [1/5, 2/5, 2/5], [2/5, 2/5, 2/5] (2)
 > listplot3d([Tab]);
 > pointplot3d([Tab],color = magenta,axes = normal, symbol = box);
 >

## do u have mathematical relation for this...

do u have mathematical relation for this matrix ? if u have, please write it here,maybe it can be possible if we write a procedure which its input is r .

## yes...

@Chia actually it seems that when u use print, print commands prints the elements of list of data itself and also print the list ([ ]) also which is not our goal here. if u use set ({ }) instead of list print will also get { } at the end of it , u can see :

 > restart:
 > Fun:=x->print(x^2);
 (1)
 > A:={seq}(i,i=1..4);
 (2)
 > map(Fun,A);op(%);
 (3)
 >

## i think the problem has been changed !...

@J4James i think the problem has been changed !

## not the answer u want !...

@lemelinm i do not know why i can not insert content to here ! as carl love says, we can not compute what u want .

testfile.txt

## you are vrey welcome...

@lemelinm u can also try this, which is so clearer than the maple defualt .
go to tools,options, go to display tab, change input display to maple notation, i think it is some what more clear . good luck

## why u use matlab ?!...

@sharena2 i think u can do whatever u want with maple !

 First 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Last Page 12 of 23
﻿