Maple Questions and Posts

These are Posts and Questions associated with the product, Maple

in a lot of paper i see that they just use the Auxiliary function without mention any detail but now i have to find out how i can reach this function, always i used u=Rdiff(ln(f),x#1,2) or u=Rdiff(ln(f),y,x)  (eq17) in mw. and it is answer for me untill now without knowing finding, but i have to figure out how they reach this in more than 1000 paper i didn't see any explanation about that they just used just in one of the paper mentioned something  like a series which i think they used this series but again is so complicated for undrestanding , i will put some problem picture and now i want to know how find them  eq17 for any equation based on the series in last picture mentioned

 

second example

third example which is so  different from other and i don't know how author reach this point 

i have to find this auxiliary function by using something like series  as mentioned in other question? how i can use this series for finding my auxiliary function u= u_0+R*diff(ln(f),x)  


 

#picture one

NULL

restart

with(PDEtools)

with(LinearAlgebra)

NULL

with(SolveTools)

_local(gamma)

Warning, A new binding for the name `gamma` has been created. The global instance of this name is still accessible using the :- prefix, :-`gamma`.  See ?protect for details.

 

undeclare(prime)

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

(1)

declare(u(x, y, z, t))

u(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*u

(2)

declare(f(x, y, z, t))

f(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*f

(3)

pde := diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+6*u(x, y, z, t)*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(x, 3)), x)+diff(alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z)), x)+mu*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(t, 2)))

diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x)+6*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))^2+6*u(x, y, z, t)*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))+diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), y))+delta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), z))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t))

(4)

pde_linear, pde_nonlinear := selectremove(proc (term) options operator, arrow; not has((eval(term, u(x, y, z, t) = a*u(x, y, z, t)))/a, a) end proc, expand(pde))

diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x)+diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), y))+delta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), z))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t)), 6*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))^2+6*u(x, y, z, t)*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x))

(5)

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]; eval(pde_linear, u(x, y, z, t) = exp(thetai)); eq15 := isolate(%, w[i])

k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]

 

k[i]^2*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+k[i]^4*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+alpha*k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+beta*k[i]^2*l[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+delta*k[i]^2*r[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+mu*k[i]^2*w[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])

 

w[i] = (1/2)*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu

(6)

eqf := f(x, y, z, t) = 1+eval(exp(thetai), eq15)

f(x, y, z, t) = 1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])

(7)

eq17 := u(x, y, z, t) = R*(diff(ln(f(x, y, z, t)), `$`(x, 2)))

u(x, y, z, t) = R*((diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x), x))/f(x, y, z, t)-(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2)

(8)

eval(eq17, eqf); simplify(eval(pde, %)); sort([solve(%, R)]); eq17 := eval(eq17, R = simplify(%[2]))

u(x, y, z, t) = R*(k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))-k[i]^2*(exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2)

 

12*R*k[i]^6*exp(((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)*(exp(((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)-3*exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)+1)*(R-2)/(1+exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu))^6

 

[0, 2]

 

u(x, y, z, t) = 2*(diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x), x))/f(x, y, z, t)-2*(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2

(9)

eq19 := eval(eq17, eqf)

u(x, y, z, t) = 2*k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))-2*k[i]^2*(exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2/(1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*t*(-1+(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1)^(1/2))/mu+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]))^2

(10)

simplify(eq19)

u(x, y, z, t) = 2*k[i]^2*exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu)/(1+exp((1/2)*((1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*k[i]^2-4*alpha)*mu)^(1/2)*t*k[i]+((2*y*l[i]+2*z*r[i]+2*x)*mu-t)*k[i]+2*eta[i]*mu)/mu))^2

(11)

pdetest(eq19, pde)

0

(12)

#second example

NULL

restart

with(PDEtools)

with(LinearAlgebra)

NULL

with(SolveTools)

_local(gamma)

``

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

(13)

declare(u(x, y, t))

u(x, y, t)*`will now be displayed as`*u

(14)

declare(f(x, y, t))

f(x, y, t)*`will now be displayed as`*f

(15)

pde := diff(u(x, y, t), x, t)+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(x, 4))+6*(diff(u(x, y, t), x))*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(x, 2))))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(y, 2)))+a*(diff(u(x, y, t), `$`(x, 2)))+b*(diff(u(x, y, t), x, y))

diff(diff(u(x, y, t), t), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x), x), x)+6*(diff(u(x, y, t), x))*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x)))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), y), y))+a*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x))+b*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), y))

(16)

oppde := [op(expand(pde))]; u_occurrences := map(proc (i) options operator, arrow; numelems(select(has, [op([op(i)])], u)) end proc, oppde); linear_op_indices := ListTools:-SearchAll(1, u_occurrences); pde_linear := add(oppde[[linear_op_indices]]); pde_nonlinear := expand(simplify(expand(pde)-pde_linear))

diff(diff(u(x, y, t), t), x)+alpha*(diff(diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x), x), x))+beta*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), y), y))+a*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x))+b*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), y))

 

6*alpha*(diff(u(x, y, t), x))*(diff(diff(u(x, y, t), x), x))

(17)

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i]; eval(pde_linear, u(x, y, t) = 1+exp(thetai)); eq15 := isolate(%, w[i])

k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i]

 

k[i]^2*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+alpha*k[i]^4*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+beta*k[i]^2*l[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+a*k[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])+b*k[i]^2*l[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+x)+eta[i])

 

w[i] = -alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a

(18)

eqf := f(x, y, t) = 1+eval(exp(thetai), eq15)

f(x, y, t) = 1+exp(k[i]*((-alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+l[i]*y+x)+eta[i])

(19)

eq17 := u(x, y, t) = R*(diff(ln(f(x, y, t)), x))

u(x, y, t) = R*(diff(f(x, y, t), x))/f(x, y, t)

(20)

eval(eq17, eqf); simplify(eval(pde, %)); sort([solve(%, R)]); eq17 := eval(eq17, R = simplify(%[2]))

[0, 2]

 

u(x, y, t) = 2*(diff(f(x, y, t), x))/f(x, y, t)

(21)

eq19 := eval(eq17, eqf)

u(x, y, t) = 2*k[i]*exp(k[i]*((-alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+l[i]*y+x)+eta[i])/(1+exp(k[i]*((-alpha*k[i]^2-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+l[i]*y+x)+eta[i]))

(22)

M := eval(rhs(eq19), i = 1)

2*k[1]*exp(k[1]*(t*(-alpha*k[1]^2-beta*l[1]^2-b*l[1]-a)+y*l[1]+x)+eta[1])/(1+exp(k[1]*(t*(-alpha*k[1]^2-beta*l[1]^2-b*l[1]-a)+y*l[1]+x)+eta[1]))

(23)

simplify(eq19)

u(x, y, t) = 2*k[i]*exp(-alpha*t*k[i]^3+((-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+y*l[i]+x)*k[i]+eta[i])/(1+exp(-alpha*t*k[i]^3+((-beta*l[i]^2-b*l[i]-a)*t+y*l[i]+x)*k[i]+eta[i]))

(24)

pdetest(eq19, pde)

0

(25)

#third example which is so different and really i don't know how the author reach this point? which is diff(arctan(f),x)?

NULL

restart

with(PDEtools)

with(LinearAlgebra)

NULL

with(SolveTools)

_local(gamma)

undeclare(prime)

`There is no more prime differentiation variable; all derivatives will be displayed as indexed functions`

(26)

declare(u(x, y, z, t))

u(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*u

(27)

declare(f(x, y, z, t))

f(x, y, z, t)*`will now be displayed as`*f

(28)

pde := diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+6*u(x, y, z, t)^2*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(x, 3))+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z))+lambda*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x, t))+mu*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), `$`(t, 2)))

diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+6*u(x, y, z, t)^2*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z))+lambda*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t))

(29)

pde_linear, pde_nonlinear := selectremove(proc (term) options operator, arrow; not has((eval(term, u(x, y, z, t) = a*u(x, y, z, t)))/a, a) end proc, expand(pde))

diff(u(x, y, z, t), t)+diff(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x), x), x)+alpha*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))+beta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), y))+delta*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), z))+lambda*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), x))+mu*(diff(diff(u(x, y, z, t), t), t)), 6*u(x, y, z, t)^2*(diff(u(x, y, z, t), x))

(30)

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]; eval(pde_linear, u(x, y, z, t) = exp(thetai)); eq15 := isolate(%, w[i])

k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i]

 

k[i]*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+k[i]^3*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+alpha*k[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+beta*k[i]*l[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+delta*k[i]*r[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+lambda*k[i]^2*w[i]*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])+mu*k[i]^2*w[i]^2*exp(k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)+eta[i])

 

w[i] = (1/2)*(-lambda*k[i]-1+(-4*beta*mu*k[i]*l[i]-4*delta*mu*k[i]*r[i]+lambda^2*k[i]^2-4*mu*k[i]^3-4*alpha*mu*k[i]+2*lambda*k[i]+1)^(1/2))/(mu*k[i])

(31)

eqf := f(x, y, z, t) = 1+eval(exp(thetai), eq15)

f(x, y, z, t) = 1+exp(k[i]*((1/2)*(-lambda*k[i]-1+(-4*beta*mu*k[i]*l[i]-4*delta*mu*k[i]*r[i]+lambda^2*k[i]^2-4*mu*k[i]^3-4*alpha*mu*k[i]+2*lambda*k[i]+1)^(1/2))*t/(mu*k[i])+l[i]*y+r[i]*z+x)+eta[i])

(32)

eq17 := u(x, y, z, t) = R*(diff(ln(f(x, y, z, t)), x))

u(x, y, z, t) = R*((diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), y), y))/f(x, y, z, t)-(diff(f(x, y, z, t), y))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2)

(33)

eval(eq17, eqf); simplify(eval(pde, %)); sort([solve(%, R)]); eq17 := eval(eq17, R = simplify(%[2]))


 

Download F-series.mw

Thanks for any help!

Hi

does anyone know when Maple Online Help will be up again?

Regards

Henning

Does Maple 2025 have a dark theme or GUI color customization?

Neither dragging the Maple Window to the screen edge nor Windows key & Arrow keys works on my
Windows 10 machine.

Is this only my installation?

Anything I can do get normal Windows windows behaviour back?

I've posted this issue in the beta forum for Maple previously, but apparently this issue was never addressed, so I am going to repost it here.

Contrary to Maple 2024, components like TextArea now ignore the general view zoom factor in Maple 2025.

I'll submit it as a software change request once Maple 2025 is on the list.

I have a student who has a problem when closing and opening a Maple file.

It seems as if Maple turns math fields into text, but still execute when using ! or !!!

The dark red part is written in a text field, but Maple still executes

If I try to write in a math field and executes, closes Maple and opens again, this does not happen, so it is not the file that is the problem.  The student is running 2024.2 version.

Can anyone explain the problem and how to solve it.

 

I am unable to add a comment or the file. I have tried several times, without any luck

In 1-D Math, subscripts can be found with crtl-F

In 2-D Math this does not work. 

Also powers of (^) cannot be searched in 2D-Math.

Are there any ways to perfom searches on subscripts or superscripts in 2-D Math?

Looking back at this question:

https://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/37691-How-Do-I-Change-The-Background-Colour

the reply by Hmm in 2009

"In Linux there is an X11 resource file for the classic worksheet, one of the settings controls the background color.  The distributed file is located in the maple/X11_defaults directory."

suggested a solution only thiis does not work for me in Maple2024. Perhaps because this worked for the classic view.

Why is there still no way to do this after 16 years or perhaps I just cannot find the option?

Is there away to change the background colour or even invert all colours?

I occasionally find myself inexplicably in a region of my worksheet that does not respond to my editing, fe.g., I cannot erae or I cannot copy. I recently typed a command-there was an error of some form and I tried unsuccessfully to edit it. Then I tried to copy the code and enter it at a prompt. It refused to enter it at the prompt but copied it below the prompt in a strnge region that I do not understand. When I retyped the command at a prompt it worked fine. I do not understand th dead regions that pop up mysteriously. (I am using Maple 2024 on a Mac) The page is too long to copy but I could upload it if given directions.

I am trying to do something that was recommended in

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4583857/how-to-use-recursion-to-define-a-number-series-in-maple

but can't get the desired sequnce. See for example my code

v := proc(m) option remember; return m; end proc;
k := 5:
v(k + 1) := 0:
v(k):=1:
for i from k - 1 by -1 to 1 do
    v(i);
end do;

I get the output 1,1,1,1

I don't get it.

Hi!

I am studying Burger's equation, and I would like to see the steps that Maple takes to solve this.  "ShowSteps" doesn't seem to work.

Unfortunately, I am unable to share the worksheet I made.

Server Error - MaplePrimes

 
 

MaplePrimes
 
 
 
Connect with Maplesoft:
Questions  |  Posts  |  Tags  |  Users  |  Unanswered  |  Maplesoft Blog  |  Badges  |  Recent
© Maplesoft, a division of Waterloo Maple Inc. .  |  maplesoft.com  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Consent Preferences  | Trademarks

 

loading

Error occurred during PDF generation. Please refresh the page and try again

this function i have is so long and my parameter are twenty they are two much when i make a change in explore i the change is so slow and i can't see some of this parameter how act to figure when i change becuase the placement of parameters i want some of parameter being in right  and some of them being in right  and figure be in the middle for see them together can we do something like that?

figure.mw

Hi everyone,

I'm trying to compute the cohomology group of some Lie algebras using the LieAlgebra package, but it appears that the Cohomology command doesn't provide the correct basis for the higher dimensional cohomology group, instead repeating up to the correct dimension only one element.

For example, with the following Lie algebra

L1:=_DG([["LieAlgebra", Alg1, [6]], [[[1, 3, 2], 1], [[1, 2, 3], -1], [[4, 6, 5], 1], [[4, 5, 6], -1]]])
DGSetup(L1)

the command

C := RelativeChains([])

does provide the correct k-forms on Alg1, but then

H := Cohomology(C)
provides
[[theta4,theta1],[theta1 &w theta4, theta1 &w theta4, theta1 &w theta4],[theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3,theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3,theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3,theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3], [theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3 &w theta4,theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3 &w theta4,theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3 &w theta4],[theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3 &w theta4 &w theta5 &w theta6, theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3 &w theta4 &w theta5 &w theta6], [theta1 &w theta2 &w theta3 &w theta4 &w theta5 &w theta6]

A similar thing does happen for the examples provided in the online help (e.g. example 1 from https://de.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=DifferentialGeometry/LieAlgebras/Cohomology). Is the command broken?

Any help is really appreciated.

restart

with(PDEtools)

undeclare(prime, quiet); declare(u(x, y, z, t), quiet); declare(f(x, y, z, t), quiet)

``

(1)

thetai := k[i]*(t*w[i]+y*l[i]+z*r[i]+x)

eqw := w[i] = (-1+sqrt(-4*beta*mu*l[i]-4*delta*mu*r[i]-4*mu*k[i]^2-4*alpha*mu+1))/(2*mu)

Bij := proc (i, j) options operator, arrow; -24*mu/(sqrt(1+(-4*beta*l[j]-4*delta*r[j]-4*alpha)*mu)*sqrt(1+(-4*beta*l[i]-4*delta*r[i]-4*alpha)*mu)-1+((2*r[i]+2*r[j])*delta+(2*l[i]+2*l[j])*beta+4*alpha)*mu) end proc

NULL

theta1 := normal(eval(eval(thetai, eqw), i = 1)); theta2 := normal(eval(eval(thetai, eqw), i = 2))

eqf := f(x, y, z, t) = theta1*theta2+Bij(1, 2)

eqfcomplex := collect(evalc(eval(eval(eqf, l[2] = conjugate(l[1])), l[1] = a+I*b)), t)

eq17 := u(x, y, z, t) = 2*(diff(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x), x))/f(x, y, z, t)-2*(diff(f(x, y, z, t), x))^2/f(x, y, z, t)^2; equ := simplify(eval(eq17, eqfcomplex))

So we want to find a substitution that removes the time dependence from u. One way is to find the maximum and see how it moves. Here, the first solution gives what we want.

ans := solve({diff(rhs(equ), x), diff(rhs(equ), y), diff(rhs(equ), z)}, {x, y, z}, explicit)

 

NULL

Download hfz.mw

i need the result for (eqt33) but i can reach the result there is any  other way for finding? i need to plot 3D of that function but without have the function how i can do explore on it

w1.mw

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Last Page 5 of 2215