Suppose that A is an nxn matrix over the finite field Z:=GF(2,q) for some q. I wan to get the smitform of A over Z. First I used the package  

with(LinearAlgebra[Generic]) 

and after that I applied the command 

S := SmithForm[Z](A)

but the mentioned command made some errors. In fact, I do not how to define commands igcdex, iquo, irem, sign and abs for SmithForm over finite fields.

Thanks for any suggestions 

how I can find solutions for non linear equations.

I want to find non zero solution.

thank you

ZAH.mw

Maple Worksheet - Error

Failed to load the worksheet /maplenet/convert/ZAH.mw .
 

Download ZAH.mw

I get this problem in a paper published in 2011. there is a table which compares the solution of a differential equation and gives the range of initial guesses. I got confused when saw maple and approximated maple, please any help me 

I'm attaching the link of paper. Please have a look at table 3. 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135411000056

Dear all,
How can I input different spacesteps in numerical solution of PDE (Heat equation) with pdsolve of Maple?

For example, the x range is x=0..L,
and I'd like to solve the PDE with spacestep1=L/100 for x=0..a and spacestep2=L/10 for x=a..L.

Thank you in advance!

Why Maple doesn't calculate this and only rewrites it??

with(inttrans);

invlaplace(exp((0.2500000000e-1-2.500000000*sqrt(0.116e-3+.8*p-3.2*10^(-10)/(p+0.2e-4)))*x)/p, p, t);
     
 

iqt + aqxy + ibq (qq*x − q*qx) = 0. write this equation in maple

how i can solve the eqution by ritz methode codes?

I have an object in 6d I'd like to visualise. The region of 6d space I am interested in is described by these equations:

{f[10] = -(.2000000000*(5.*f[21]*f[20]*f[22]-5.*f[20]*f[22]^2+20.*f[20]*f[21]-20.*f[20]*f[22]+135.*f[20]+46.*f[21]))/(f[21]*(f[21]-1.*f[22])),
f[11] = -1.*f[22]-4.,
f[12] = -(1.*(f[22]^2+4.*f[22]-27.))/f[21],
f[20] = f[20],
f[21] = f[21],
f[22] = f[22]}

clearly the first three variables are dependant, and the latter three are independant. I'd like to graph the first three as the latter three vary between bounds and then colour the points on the output based on where they came from in the input, so i can get some intuition about what these equations mean.
 

How do I plot the optimal control functions in an optimal control problem ?

Here is a simple procedure that works fine if entered using 1D Maple input
> Q:=proc(x)
sin(x)
end proc;
but if you use 2D math input
> q:=proc(x)
sin(x);

  end proc;

Error, unterminated procedure
    Typesetting:-mambiguous(qAssignTypesetting:-mambiguous(

      procApplyFunction(x) sinApplyFunction(x),

      Typesetting:-merror("unterminated procedure")))
Error, unable to parse
    Typesetting:-mambiguous(  Typesetting:-mambiguous(end,

      Typesetting:-merror("unable to parse")) procsemi)

Ouch! But to confuse things further the following procedures may be entered using 2D math and work fine:
>H := proc (x) x^2*sin(x) end proc;
>K := proc (x) sin(x^2) end proc;
Doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps 2D math is not ready for prime time?

 

Hi!

I have a rather long Maple code and want it to be executed multiple times with a parameter changed each time.

Surely this can be done with the loop structure, but it seems the whole loop structure must be contained into one single execution group, which makes it to be a little inconvenient, since the code is too long.

So is there any alternative way to realize this utility?

Best regard and thanks!

This is not a problem per se, but more to understand the background.

restart;

f := polylog(2, -x);

int(f/(x+1), x);

convert(f, dilog);

int(%/(x+1), x)

The integration of the polylog maple is not capable of doing, but after converting to dilog it finds an anti derivative.

That leads to the question, why is dilog as a separate to polylog(2,*) implemented anyway? Why couldn't it all be done with the more general polylog function?

I'm also wondering why maple has difficulties to integrate

int(dilog(x+1)/(x+a),x)

for general a.

Using Maple 2018.2.1, I'm receiving a lost kernel message when importing the attached data file with ImportMatrix. I traced the issue to a "*" symbol at the end of the file but would have expected this to cause an error message (if any error at all) instead of the connection to the kernel to be lost. Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding the usage of ImportMatrix?

test.mw

test2.txt

Hi 
How we can obtain inversion of the high-dimensional matrix (for example 600*600) in maple?
(A fast-time command)
thanks

Look I have actually purchased the software 3 time in total throughout my life, but i have no money at this point but i have a Linux OS now and i am enjoying learning how to use that, so i was wondering if there is a standard old verson that is open source and availble for a Linux install