Hi All,

I seem to have problems with the table formatting in Maple TA 2016, concretely changing the cell padding has no effect. Is this a general issue ? I don't have this problem in Maple TA 10 (I tried both versions using the same browser (Safari)).

Thanks!

Elisabeth

I want to reference the previous equation/expression which is not displayed (':')in my worksheet. I allready know the '%' sign, but this references the previous equation/expression which was executed . By previous I mean the result (which is not displayed) in the previous line.

As I do not want the previous equation to be displayed I also cannot use the equation lable (CTRL+L).

Example

x:=a=b+1:

solve(previous,{b});

Thank you for your help.

I'm new here, so I'm not totally sure this is the right place to ask this. I apologize if it isn't, please let me know in that case.

My problem is that Maple won't recognize the built-in command 'complexplot3d'. For example, typing:

complexplot3d(z^2, z = -1-I .. 1+I)

doesn't do anything, and it's displayed again in blue as if it was not a command.

Any kind of help would be extremely helpful, as I have no clue of what's going on. Thanks in advance!

Here, I attached my maple code. I need to find root. I am using fsolve. But I am not geting the root. Please any one help me... to find the root.

Download root.mw

Is there a way to force the branch choice with the LambertW?

If I turn on all _EnvAllSolutions:=true:

I get a placeholder for the branch. Unfortunately the name of this placeholder changes every time I re-evaluate.

Is there a way to force this to take a certain value?

Regards.

How do I use Maple to pull the propane price from www.fuelsonline.ca ?

If I use HTTP[Get]("http://www.fuelsonline.ca")

I only get            301,""

Any help?

hi,

how we can use maple to find solution of singuler integral equation by using product nystrom method or toeplitz method in maple?

I have the following expression (generated by some other procedure):

This does not have a taylor expansion in pV[6] in the general case because the square roots can become negative:

taylor(xpr,pV[6]);
Error, does not have a taylor expansion, try series()

But I can get an expansion by restrictig the range of pV[6]:

taylor(xpr,pV[6]) assuming -0.01<pV[6],pV[6]<0.01;

So far things are perfectly fine. But when I try mtaylor:

mtaylor(xpr,pV[6]) assuming -0.01<pV[6],pV[6]<0.01;
Error, (in assuming) when calling 'mtaylor'. Received: 'does not have a taylor expansion, try series()'

So the assumption seems to be ignored. I can work around this by expanding in pV[6] first, using taylor, and then expanding the result from that using mtaylor (I really also want the expansions in the other pV components; 6 in total although in this example some do not show up). I'll have to convince myself that this work-around gives the correct result but I think it does. However, I don't particularly like it.

I consider this a bug and am tempted to submit an SCR. But before I do that; is there anything obvious I am missing here?

Thanks,

M.D.

PS: This was done using Maple 15. I'll check newer versions later.

mtaylor_assuming.mw

Hello, when you run an error occurs:

Error, (in plots:-display) unknown plot object: circle
Error, (in plots:-display) expecting plot structure but received: P[0]
Error, (in plots:-display) expecting plot structure but received: PP

I'm not good in Maple. Please help me understand.

Programm: https://dropmefiles.com/Qnkzn

I attempted to show that two lines are parallel.  I started with a problem in Geometry for which I do not have the solution.

I tried several ways with Maple to show this to be true.  Most of the time, I ended when maple could not determine if a-b = c-d, etc.

brg_proof.txt contains a statement of the problem and my latest maple code.

Question: How should I approach the proof, by the compass and straight edge method?  Is this possible in maple?

I had a single variable equation but I do not know where variable y come from for using genus to run

I have problem to get real answer in a simple equation. maple just give me complex answer.

how i can get parametric real answer? Ihave trid this two way but not applicaple.

with(RealDomain); assume(T::real)

My code is:
Qz := 7.39833755306637215940309264474*10^7*sqrt(1/T)*(T-297.2)/T-16242.7935852035929839431551189*sqrt(1/T)/T;

q := (.6096*(299.2-T))/(sqrt(1.60000000000000000000000000000*10^(-9)-r^2)-0.346410161513775458705489268300e-4);

with(RealDomain); assume(T::real);

e := simplify(solve({0 = q-Qz}, {T}))

and the result like:

e := {T = 1/RootOf(-609600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000+(879515018020273730453559011332895956000000000000000000000000000*sqrt(-625000000*r^2+1)-761682348615485390130551939524898425387968750740910059296172487)*Z^5+(-2959335021226548863761237057896000000000000000000000000000000*sqrt(-625000000*r^2+1)+2562859306691152293409465394507279449380503585614734443742000)*_Z^3+182392320000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000*_Z^2)^2}

dose anyone hase any opinion?

Why won't this procedure Compile? All I get is a cryptic and ungrammatical error message.

    step:= proc(
          n::integer[4],
          XYZ::Matrix(datatype= float[8]),
          E::Vector(datatype=integer[4]), F::Vector(datatype=integer[4]),
          W::Matrix(datatype= float[8]), #3x2 scratch matrix
          mu::integer[4]
     )
     option autocompile;
     local
          i::integer[4], j::integer[4],
          ed::float[8],
          fd::float[8],
          p::float[8], t::float[8]       
     ;
          to mu do
               for i to n do
                    ed:= 0;  fd:= 0;
                    for j to 3 do
                          p:= XYZ[i,j];
                          t:= XYZ[E[i],j] - p;
                          ed:= ed+t^2;
                          W[j,1]:= t;
                          t:= XYZ[F[i],j] - p;
                          fd:= fd+t^2;
                          W[j,2]:= t
                    od;
                    ed:= sqrt(ed) + .01;  fd:= sqrt(fd) + .01;
                    for j to 3 do
                         XYZ[i,j]:= 0.995*XYZ[i,j] - 0.01*W[j,1]/ed + 0.02*W[j,2]/fd
                    od
               od
          od
     end proc;
Compiler:-Compile(step);

Error, (in Compiler:-Compile1) In memory compilation failed

Hello guys,

I was just playing around with the Shanks transformation of a power series, when I noticed that polynomials aren't evaluated as I would expect.
I created this minimal working example; the function s should evaluate for z=0 to a[0], however it return simply 0.
Is there something I messed up?

Download evaluate_sum.mw

Thanks for your help,

Sören

Hi all,

It is believeble for me that the KummerU function is infinite or has a singular solution at r=0;

but without the command D(R) and dsolve ({er, D(R)(0)=0}, {R(r)}) that show the r=0 is a singular solution for the R(r), how could I prove it without using of these commands: for example is plotting of this function applicable??

while we have not the value of the  \lambda

Download Kummer.mwKummer.mw